Ever since throwing a leg over the 2013 Beta 250 RR, I can’t say enough good things about it. The bike handles super light, turns on a dime and the motor lugs along so well that half the time you think you’re on a fuel injected four-stroke—yes, it is that good.
It really feels as good as a KTM 250XC or XCW; however, where I find it excels over the KTM is in the motor, where the bottom to mid-range is so damn good that this Beta just rolls on so nice. The mid-range power is awesome too. The KTM revs higher, but 95 per cent of the riders out there are not riding through the trails pinned in fourth gear, so the higher revving power of the KTM is a moot point.
The Beta also excels with its turning agility over the KTM, which is another area that helps a smaller rider like myself. The Beta also sits lower, but it doesn’t seem that different to the KTM with a low seat added.
250 or 300?
The biggest choice for riders with this new Beta is whether to get the 250 or 300. KTM suggests its 250XC or XCW for racers and 300XC or XCW for riders, but Beta is the exact opposite. If you race every weekend, go with the 300 RR. But if you’re like me and like to ride, not race, then the 250 RR is where it’s at.
To read the full review, see Bike review: 2013 Beta 250RR 2-Stroke Enduro.